tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1862174023932643058.post7700124532655959508..comments2023-10-26T08:20:45.326-06:00Comments on Insignificant Wranglings: Rhetoric v. Philosophy Take 1702931Insignificant Wranglerhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/15950540902913057757noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1862174023932643058.post-7247294312989402152008-12-10T10:35:00.000-06:002008-12-10T10:35:00.000-06:00I don't solely think about phil v. rhet this way, ...I don't solely think about phil v. rhet this way, but do see it as a common way that the argument gets framed. <BR/><BR/>But I would hesitate to call the work I do with Derrida, Levinas, Vitanza and others "pragmatic."<BR/><BR/>More just having fun. So, in that spirit, do tell!Insignificant Wranglerhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/15950540902913057757noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1862174023932643058.post-68056869056100260722008-12-05T21:50:00.000-06:002008-12-05T21:50:00.000-06:00[Smiling big:] Oh, I just realized where you've be...[Smiling big:] Oh, I just realized where you've been going wrong all these years. You have constructed a false dichotomy in your worldview where everything is either A) Philosophical/Idealistic thought or B) Rhetorical/pragmatic thought.<BR/><BR/>You're failing to see the third way... want me tell you the answer?Caseyhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03820693522030084335noreply@blogger.com