tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1862174023932643058.post6589390808960676338..comments2023-10-26T08:20:45.326-06:00Comments on Insignificant Wranglings: Gay Marriage vs. Civil UnionsInsignificant Wranglerhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/15950540902913057757noreply@blogger.comBlogger5125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1862174023932643058.post-13449911279179854792008-12-17T18:29:00.000-06:002008-12-17T18:29:00.000-06:00True, Wishy. I guess I'm making a "meantime" argum...True, Wishy. I guess I'm making a "meantime" argument--getting some protection, quickly, is better than no protection. And as Prop 8's keep popping up, we need to do something now. That something will not be ideal, but it might reverse the trend.Insignificant Wranglerhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/15950540902913057757noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1862174023932643058.post-86006025852557243962008-12-17T15:23:00.000-06:002008-12-17T15:23:00.000-06:00This is my favorite blog that I've ran across in t...This is my favorite blog that I've ran across in the past couple of weeks. Not good for much except to give me a laugh during finals week. http://fuckyoupenguin.blogspot.com/Floyd the Barberhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16093800180274715451noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1862174023932643058.post-53779973084168422582008-12-17T12:34:00.000-06:002008-12-17T12:34:00.000-06:00but the major interest on each side is (as far as ...but the major interest on each side is (as far as policy goes) is to appropriate the advantage that the written laws currently afford. the offer of another term that is equal doesn't guarantee protection that is identical.<BR/><BR/>new terminology is fine, but because language is already (and always) mutable and diffuse the argument about current terminology is an important one.Wishydighttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06141057866370676641noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1862174023932643058.post-73671603200618405212008-12-14T23:50:00.000-06:002008-12-14T23:50:00.000-06:00I like that too.I like that too.Insignificant Wranglerhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/15950540902913057757noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1862174023932643058.post-27907453610797805362008-12-14T14:05:00.000-06:002008-12-14T14:05:00.000-06:00Yes, skip the word "Marriage", use the word "Wed" ...Yes, skip the word "Marriage", use the word "Wed" to include all people who are wed to each other, LGBT or Staight. At every wedding that I have attended, the people who are to be joined say, "With this ring, I thee wed". Hence, www.civillywedd.com The two "D's" represent two persons, doesn't matter their gender.Ringbearerhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11765540097243489921noreply@blogger.com